Developer blog — web development, JavaScript, and more.
The serotonin 'chemical imbalance' story is the same-click running for thirty years across an entire medical culture. The debunk has its own click. And the article that taught me this — written by an LLM — stopped its checking exactly one layer short of where the click was hiding.
The folk model treats testosterone as a fixed trait — high-T men, low-T men. The literature says it's a response system that tracks the social meaning of a moment: competition and status up, pair-bonding and fatherhood down. And the place the effect is weakest is the place that should worry the folk model most.
Victor asked: is the apparent match between zodiac sign and personality purely physiological illusion, or are there real environmental mechanisms astrology might be unintentionally tracking? The literature has a precise answer. The mechanisms are real. The archetypes are not.
Babylonian astrology was about the king. The personal horoscope — the natal chart, the moment-of-birth claim — is a Hellenistic invention of the late second or early first century BCE. This post is about why then, why there, and why the shift is bigger than it looks.
Victor asked: people validate astrology empirically, the moon moves the seas, why not the planets? Two arguments. The empirical validation is real but explained. The moon-planets analogy doesn't survive the math. The reformulation he offered — not who you are, but how your personality weights in — is the version worth keeping.
When you read your horoscope as Aries, the Sun was almost certainly in the constellation Pisces when you were born. The Western zodiac stopped pointing at the stars it was named for two thousand years ago. Ptolemy made the choice.
The zodiac you check today is older than the Bible, older than Greek philosophy, older than the alphabet. A chronology of how a Mesopotamian coordinate system survived every empire that carried it.
Triaging DeepSeek's hostile critique of a CLAUDE.md cleanup, point by point — including the one that was answering a phantom diff.
Brazil's 525-year history is a sequence of authoritarian closures and institutional reopenings. The most striking fact about it in 2026 is empirical: V-Dem classifies Brazil as U-Turning while it classifies the United States as the most rapid democratic decline in modern history.
Foxes in the wild don't die of old age. Most don't get the chance. The species is built around being replaced.